Breaking and entering under R.C. 2911.13 is trespassing in an unoccupied building, or on someone's land, with the purpose of stealing or committing a felony. It is the charge for the garage, the shed, the closed business, the vacant house. What the state has to prove, how it differs from burglary and trespass, and what a fifth-degree felony actually carries.
Breaking and entering is the charge for the garage, the storage unit, the closed business, the vacant house, the construction site. Nobody was home. Something was taken, or the state thinks something was about to be. The difference between this charge and a misdemeanor trespass is one element: the purpose you had when you went in. The difference between this charge and burglary is whether anyone was, or was likely to be, inside.
That second line matters more than people expect. Breaking and entering is a fifth-degree felony, the lowest felony grade in Ohio. Burglary starts at a fourth-degree felony and, when someone is home, is a second-degree felony. Prosecutors sometimes charge burglary on facts that are really breaking and entering, and breaking and entering on facts that are really trespass. Getting the charge to match the facts is often half the case.
Most of these cases come with company: criminal trespass and vandalism, theft, receiving stolen property, or possessing criminal tools. Sorting out which of those the evidence actually supports is usually the first job.
Breaking and entering is governed by R.C. 2911.13. It has two parts, and they are not the same offense in practice.
Under (A), no person shall trespass in an unoccupied structure by force, stealth, or deception, with purpose to commit a theft offense or any felony inside it. That is the classic case: the shed, the garage, the closed store.
Under (B), no person shall trespass on the land or premises of another with purpose to commit a felony. No structure and no forced entry required, but the intended crime has to be a felony, not a misdemeanor theft.
Either one is breaking and entering, a fifth-degree felony. Notice what the statute does not say. It does not say entering without permission. It says entering with a purpose, and the state has to prove that purpose beyond a reasonable doubt. Being inside a building you had no right to be in is trespass. Being inside it to steal is breaking and entering. The evidence of the second thing is usually thin.
Criminal trespass under R.C. 2911.21 is entering or remaining on someone else's land or premises without privilege. Most trespass is a fourth-degree misdemeanor: up to 30 days in jail and a fine of up to $250.
Breaking and entering is trespass plus purpose. Take away the purpose and the felony is gone. That is why so much of the defense in these cases is about what the person was doing there, and why a reduction to criminal trespass is a common and realistic outcome when the state's proof of intent is a guess.
Burglary under R.C. 2911.12 is trespass by force, stealth, or deception in an occupied structure, with purpose to commit a crime inside. The word that separates it from breaking and entering is occupied.
Burglary of a home when someone is present or likely to be present is a second-degree felony, with a presumption of prison. Burglary of any other occupied structure is a third-degree felony. Trespass in a habitation when someone is present or likely present, with no proven purpose to commit a crime, is a fourth-degree felony. Breaking and entering, a fifth-degree felony, sits below all of them. Which one you are charged with depends almost entirely on what kind of building it was and whether anyone might have been in it.
These offenses cover overlapping conduct and are often charged in the alternative, but they carry very different consequences. Which one applies turns on the structure involved, whether anyone was present, and what the State says you intended when you went in. Speak with one of our attorneys about what has actually been charged in your case. Consultations are free and confidential.
Ohio law defines "occupied structure" in R.C. 2909.01. It covers houses, buildings, outbuildings, vehicles, trailers, tents, and other structures when they are maintained as a dwelling, occupied as a habitation, specially adapted for overnight accommodation, or when a person is present or likely to be present.
The definition is broader than it sounds. A house is occupied even when the family is on vacation, because it is maintained as a dwelling. A detached garage or a shed usually is not, unless someone lives in it. A business is occupied if someone is likely to be there, which turns on the hour and the habits of the place. When a prosecutor charges burglary on a garage or a closed shop, this definition is where that charge gets tested.
Breaking and entering under R.C. 2911.13 is a fifth-degree felony. The prison range is six to twelve months under R.C. 2929.14, and the fine is up to $2,500. For a fifth-degree felony with no prior record, the sentencing statutes push toward community control rather than prison, and in most of our breaking and entering cases that is where the fight over sentencing is actually won. Restitution comes on top of whatever the sentence is.
The sentence is rarely the lasting cost. A felony conviction shows up on every background check, and a felony property offense reads to employers and landlords as theft. It closes off a range of jobs, complicates housing and professional licensing, takes away firearm rights, and for non-citizens can affect immigration status. Sealing the record later is possible for most fifth-degree felonies, but only after a waiting period.
Breaking and entering almost never comes alone. The charges that usually travel with it, and why they matter:
Most breaking and entering cases carry a theft count. Theft under R.C. 2913.02 is a first-degree misdemeanor under $1,000 and climbs to a felony above it, so the value of what was taken can matter as much as the entry.
Restitution is where these cases get expensive. The property owner will ask for the missing items, the broken door or window, the locks, the cleanup, sometimes lost business and insurance deductibles. Courts order restitution routinely and rarely look behind the number unless someone makes them.
We make them. Restitution is disputed when:
Paying restitution can also be leverage. A prosecutor who knows the owner will be made whole is more willing to reduce the charge or agree to community control. But the number has to be right first, and agreeing to it before the evidence is reviewed gives that leverage away.
Almost every breaking and entering case is won or lost on one of four questions: whether this person entered at all, whether they had permission, whether the building was actually unoccupied, and what they intended when they went in. Everything else is detail. The questions we work through:
The intent question is the one prosecutors underestimate. Being found in a building, or near it after an alarm, proves trespass at most. Intent to steal has to come from somewhere: something in hand, tools that only make sense for one purpose, a statement. When it comes only from the fact of the entry, the charge is a misdemeanor dressed as a felony.
These cases start with an alarm, a suspicious-person call, or a surveillance clip, and the arrest is usually made nearby rather than inside. That sequence creates its own set of issues. Whether the stop was supported by reasonable suspicion. Whether the search of the backpack or the car was lawful. Whether the person was questioned in custody without Miranda warnings. Whether the video actually shows a face, or a figure in a hoodie at forty yards. Whether the state kept the whole recording or only the clip the officer thought mattered. A police report is a summary written after the conclusion was reached. The footage, the dispatch log, and the evidence receipts are the record, and we get all of it before we accept any of it.
Because breaking and entering is a felony, the municipal court diversion programs that handle first-offense misdemeanors do not apply. The felony equivalent is Intervention in Lieu of Conviction.
Intervention in Lieu of Conviction under R.C. 2951.041 is available when drug or alcohol use, mental illness, an intellectual disability, or human trafficking victimization was a factor leading to the offense, and the person meets the statute's eligibility rules. A large share of breaking and entering cases fit that description, whether or not anyone said so at the time of arrest.
If the court grants it, the case is stayed while the person completes a treatment plan, and successful completion ends in dismissal rather than a conviction. Where ILC is not available or not granted, the usual alternatives are a reduction to a misdemeanor, or a plea with community control and an agreed restitution figure. Which one is realistic depends on the county and the prosecutor as much as the facts.
The two mistakes that hurt most in these cases are talking to the officer to explain what you were doing there, and going back to the property. Both feel reasonable. Both give the state evidence it did not have. Before anything else:
Permission, prior access, and where you were at what time are the facts that end these cases early. They are also the facts that disappear if nobody saves them.
The Law Offices of Brian J. Smith, ltd. defends breaking and entering charges in the common pleas courts of Northern Ohio, usually from the indictment stage. The order of work is the same in nearly every case: get the full video and the dispatch record, test whether the entry and the identification hold up, then press the intent element, which is where the felony lives. If the charge should have been trespass, we say so early, because the reduction is easier before the case has momentum. If the facts support Intervention in Lieu, we build that application from the start rather than as a fallback. The goal in most of these cases is the one people walk in with: no felony on the record.
This page is general information about Ohio law, not legal advice. Penalties can change, and every case depends on its facts. If you have been charged with breaking and entering, criminal trespass, or a related property offense, contact the Law Offices of Brian J. Smith, ltd. to discuss your case.
The attorneys at The Law Offices of Brian J. Smith, ltd. provide criminal defense representation in courts along the North Coast of Ohio, including all courts in the following counties: Ashtabula, Cuyahoga, Erie, Geauga, Huron, Lake, Lorain, Ottawa, Portage, Sandusky, and Summit.