Standardized Field Sobriety Tests

Police use standardized field sobriety tests (SFSTs) to justify their arrests and prosecutors use the results to pursue OVI charges. A thorough understanding of the SFSTs is required raise an attack against the purported results.

NOTE:  NHTSA Released an Updated 2023 SFST Manual

What are SFSTs?

Police might conduct several tests at the side of the road to evaluate possible impairment. These might include an alphabet test, counting backwards, finger counting, lack of convergence test, modified Romberg test, horizontal gaze nystagmus, walk-and-turn and one-leg-stand test. Only the last three of these are standardized tests, meaning there is some research to support a finding that a person may be over the legal limit if they display sufficient clues on the tests.


Research suggests that, if the tests are done appropriately, there is an 88% probability that a person is over the legal limit for alcohol if they display 4 out of a 6 possible clues on the horizontal gaze nystagmus test, 79% probability if they display 2 out of a possible 8 clues on the walk-and-turn test, and 83% probability if they display 2 out of 4 possible clues on the one-leg-stand test. Officers must perform the tests correctly for these results to be admissible in court. However, in Ohio they need not perform the tests perfectly, but rather must "substantially comply" with the instructions for performing the tests as found in the current 2023 NHTSA SFST Manual (here is the 2018 NHTSA manual)

Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN)

The HGN test involves the officer moving his finger or pen side to side as the person follows the stimulus with their eyes only. This test is not evaluating the person's ability to keep their eyes on the pen. Rather, it is performed to detect horizontal nystagmus, which in plain English means a slight shaking of the eyes side to side. The officer should start by ensuring there are no flashing lights or other conditions that may affect the results while asking questions about potential medical conditions that might affect the test. The officer will then move on to an instruction phase.

Instruction Phase:

The Officer should begin the test with the following instructions:

The Officer should also have the person remove any glasses before beginning the test.

Medical Evaluation Phase:

There are many things that can cause HGN other than alcohol use. In addition to asking questions about such other conditions, the officer must start the HGN by performing two screening techniques.

Check for Resting Nystagmus and Equal Pupil Size:

For this step of the evaluation, the officer should hold the stimulus in front of the person's eyes to detect whether the person is displaying nystagmus (shaking of the eyes) while their eyes are at a resting state and whether the person's eyes are of equal pupil size. If either is detected, the HGN test will be unreliable due to the potential influence of another condition.

Check for Equal Tracking:

If a person's eyes do not track the stimulus together, this may be another sign of a condition that will make the results of the HGN unreliable. To check for equal tracking, the officer must do the following

  • Position the stimulus approximately 12-15 inches from the suspect’s nose and slightly above eye level.
  • Move the stimulus smoothly from the center position out to the suspect’s left, then smoothly back across the suspect’s face to the right side.
  • Movement of the stimulus should take approximately two (2) seconds out and two seconds back to the center for each eye.
  • A total of two (2) passes should be made.

HGN Test 1 - Lack of Smooth Pursuit:

The testing phase of the HGN begins with checking for a lack of smooth pursuit. The officer should perform the test as follows:

HGN Test 2 - Distinct and Sustained Nystagmus at Maximum Deviation:

The second testing phase of the HGN is to check for distinct and sustained nystagmus when the stimulus reaches maximum deviation. The officer should perform the test as follows:

HGN Test 3 - Onset of Nystagmus Prior to 45 Degrees:

The third testing phase of the HGN is to check for onset of nystagmus prior to 45 degrees (i.e., if the eyes start to shake before the stimulus reaches a 45 degree angle from the center of the person's phase). The officer should perform the test as follows:

Vertical Nystagmus:

Many officers will then continue to check for nystagmus while moving the stimulus up and down; however, this is NOT part of the standardized tests.

Clues: (4 out of a possible 6 clues indicate a BAC over .08)

There are 6 possible clues on the HGN, 1 for each eye on each of the three tests (lack of smooth pursuit, distinct and sustained nystagmus at maximum deviation, and onset of nystagmus prior to 45 degrees).

Walk-and-Turn

The walk-and-turn test does not merely test whether a person can walk a straight line, but rather it tests the person's ability to divide their attention and clues are marked if the person does not walk the line just as instructed. The tests begins with an instruction phase before moving on to the walking and balancing phase.

Instruction Phase:

Walking and Counting Phase:

Clues: (2 out of 8 clues indicates BAC over .08)

2 Possible Clues During Instruction Phase:

  • Cannot balance during instructional stage (steps out of position).
  • Starts too soon.

6 Possible Clues During Walking and Counting Phase:

  • Stops while walking.
  • Misses heel-to-toe.
  • Steps off the line.
  • Uses arms to balance.
  • Improper turn.
  • Incorrect number of steps.

One-Leg-Stand

For the one-leg-stand test, the person must stand on one leg for at least thirty seconds while the officer times the test.

Instruction Phase:

Counting and Balancing Phase:

Clues: (2 out of a possible 4 clues indicates a BAC over .08).

Conclusion

This is just a brief overview of SFSTs. As a general rule, it is best to decline a request to take these tests.

An experienced OVI attorney will evaluate how the tests were performed, the instructions, the demonstrations, the conditions, the performance on the tests and the various research studies regarding the tests. At Smith's Law Offices, our attorneys have completed the same NHTSA Standardized Field Sobreity Testing and Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement (ARIDE) course that the police receive. We know how to evaluate and take the tests apart because, in addition to our legal research, we have been certified as being able to perform the tests ourselves.

StarStarStarStarStar

"Professional, upfront, knowledgeable, made the whole appeals process way less stressful, made me feel comfortable at the hearing, and won my appeal! Highly recommend using!"
Josh

StarStarStarStarStar

"Brian is a very good attorney and I am very happy with the way that he handled my unemployment case. He is very professional and informative and easy to talk to and he explains concerns very well. I would recommend him to anyone. He is very thorough and made me feel very confident with him handling my case. Thank you very much for your hard work in my case."
Valerie

StarStarStarStarStar

"Thank you Brian for representing me with my unemployment case. I was over whelmed and devastated at the loss of my job after 27 years of employment. You was my rock that helped me through this nightmare, I couldn't have done it without you. You are very professional and easy to talk to, I appreciate all you did for me."
Sandra

StarStarStarStarStar

"Excellent service, not only did I win my case but the level of customer service was phenomenal!! Anytime i had a question it was answered so that i could understand it.
I was also extremely prepared and ready before we went to court.
It was such a nice process. I would recommend this company to anyone i know!!"  
Jennifer

StarStarStarStarStar

"Beat Walmart unemployment case!  Took the time to help me think this case through. Helped me prioritize the events that happened. Came up with a winning strategy that ultimately won my appeal hearing against the retail giant Walmart!"
Brian

StarStarStarStarStar

"There are only good things to be said about this Law Firm, Attorney Brian Smith and Attorney John Sivinski.  I was blindsided by separation at my former employment and then denied unemployment benefits as well.  In addition to the denial of benefits, I also lost two rounds of appeals.  Before my third appeal, which involved a phone hearing, I was very fortunate to find this Law Firm.  They were meticulous and extremely experienced in helping to turn the situation around."
Jill

StarStarStarStarStar

"Brian is very responsive and very thorough. I was very nervous throughout the process, and he made me feel relaxed and confident. I would highly recommend Brian to all my friends and family because I am confident he will not let them down, he is very trustworthy and personable. Thanks so much Brian for your professionalism and you eagerness to go the extra mile. You are an excellent attorney."
Sonya

StarStarStarStarStar

"Mr. Smith is an amazing lawyer who listens and takes his time to make sure he understands every detail of your particular case. I would recommend him to my family/friends if ever needed. Mr. Smith helped me understand the procedure which helped me better prepare myself for my hearing. The outcome was exactly what we were looking for. Thank you!"
Tiffinie

StarStarStarStarStar

"I was extremely happy working Brian & John on my case.  They were very thorough & easy to talk with.  I would highly recommend them to anyone!"
Debra

StarStarStarStarStar

"Great law firm.  My attorney help me immensely. My job fired me unjustly and they help me get my unemployment back. They help file everything and keep you updated on what going on. Very friendly and helpful. Wish these guys the best in the future!"
Chris

StarStarStarStarStar

"Brian and his colleague John were incredibly helpful and supportive. Not only did they make me feel secure, I felt represented and heard. I won my case with their help and hard work! I highly recommend them for anyone who is having to fight their employer for unemployment. I can not thank them enough!"  
Amanda

StarStarStarStarStar

"Brian Smith is the best! He handled my claim in a most timely manner an professional manner. Could not have done this by myself. Bravo!!!"
Doris

StarStarStarStarStar

"I would absolutely recommend Law Offices of Brian J. Smith, ltd. Brian and John worked with my (juvenile) son and I on a very challenging case. The case even went to the Supreme Court. . . We wouldn’t have WON without their experience and dedication. They were very professional, considerate and understanding especially when things became overwhelming for us. We couldn’t be more thankful for their services."
Sonia

Contact Us

For a Free Telephone Consultation
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Collage of legal awards and bar association logos including Avvo Rating 10.0, National College for DUI Defense, West Shore Bar Association, Parma Bar Association, DUI Defense Lawyers Association, American Association of Premier DUI Attorneys, Super Lawyers, Million Dollar Advocates Forum, Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association, Lorain County Bar Association, AV Preeminent Martindale-Hubbell Lawyer Ratings, National Employment Lawyers Association, Ohio State Bar Association, Cuyahoga Criminal Defense Lawyers Association, LERA Advancing Workplace Relations, ABA Defending Liberty Pursuing Justice, and Ohio Employment Lawyers Association.
Please keep in mind that the success of any legal matter depends on the unique circumstances of each case and we cannot guarantee particular results for future clients based on successes we have achieved in past legal matters.